Why You Shouldn't Take VC Money
0:00
So I spoke to tons of investors last year and tons of people who took
0:05
investment capital over the last several years and
0:08
Santos was basically advocating for it because in his prior experiences it had
0:14
accelerated everything
0:15
When they had done it basically as a result of the PR hit that came from it
0:20
And I was open to it and the way that we were building it seemed like it would
0:26
sort of turning into like
0:28
Adventure business at the time or whatever
0:30
So these but over the course of the year, you know things change for us a lot
0:35
and where we ended up was
0:37
kind of where I was before we started talking to these people and
0:42
It's squarely in the bootstrappers camp and like this is what I sort of define
0:47
as the bootstrappers camp, right?
0:48
Like I think the dividends are good
0:50
I think that if you create a company that is profitable and growing you deserve
0:55
to get paid as a reward
0:56
You should get paid millions of dollars a year and you shouldn't be waiting on
1:00
some
1:00
You know strapped for cash for some liquidity event in the future that may or
1:03
may not happen and
1:04
Just the way tech investors are
1:07
None of the ones I spoke to are dividend advocates. They're all squarely in
1:11
this like you know growth camp
1:12
And I found the investor value proposition to be pre-week
1:16
There seems to be a lot of people promising support and go to market in
1:22
recruiting which
1:23
my view is
1:25
the go to market help is more to get a founder like me excited and
1:29
dreaming bigger dreams of like this ultimate exit someday and
1:33
If the growth actually occurred it was probably my team doing it and not the
1:38
investor
1:39
And then you know this help with like finding executives
1:42
Which is an outsourced service that you don't need investors and their networks
1:46
to do like you can literally just pay and get that
1:49
and
1:51
look
1:52
My view is if you don't have to have a new seat at the table
1:58
Then you should avoid that because a new seat at the table with a different set
2:02
of interests at best
2:03
That will slow you down at worst even if they have a minority stake there are
2:08
ways these people can ruin your life
2:10
I just spoke to a lot of different people with a lot of horror stories over the
2:13
last couple years
2:14
So they can ruin your life and then God forbid something happens
2:18
Something macro happens that slows you down
2:21
It can crunch your remaining equity stake
2:24
And there's kind of nothing you can do about it
2:28
So I think that that
2:31
In my opinion, I'm better off without it, you know
2:34
and there's this
2:37
different set of interests that every investor has because they're in the
2:42
portfolio game and you are not and
2:44
There can come a time when if you have three or four investors and it's sort of
2:48
like a lot of your equity
2:50
And they have some type of preference that they can decide that they want you
2:54
to do something some sort of a transaction
2:56
That you do not want to do
2:59
And man, I heard some horror stories about this
3:01
There's just a whole machine set up
3:05
To make you do things that you do not want to do
3:09
to put it that way
3:12
so
3:13
There's another fundamental problem that you sort of notice when you're talking
3:17
to investors and by the way these guys are
3:20
super smart in you know what they do and
3:22
A lot of them are operators and we're super smart and being operators most a
3:27
long time ago. I think but
3:28
a lot of investors are very rich and they got very rich doing something totally
3:34
different than what for instance I am doing today, right?
3:37
like
3:38
Being an investor for 30 years is not being a startup founder being a D to C
3:42
Building a D to C company 10 years ago is not being a startup founder being a
3:45
startup founder 30 years ago is not being a startup founder today
3:49
But super rich people tend to think that they understand everything very deeply
3:56
That's just what being rich does to you. So I
4:00
Think that can just be annoying to people at least based upon the conversations
4:06
that I had, you know
4:07
For instance this year. I want to do something that I think investors would
4:15
Maybe maybe let me pursue for a very short period of time before telling me to
4:21
stop
4:21
They would be like okay. You've done well enough. We'll let you have this and
4:25
and what I want to do is give away an
4:28
Incredibly valuable product to hopefully millions of people totally free and
4:33
convert a tiny percentage of them
4:35
To a very underpriced price point
4:41
That's just the opposite of what of what this game they're playing says that
4:47
you should do and
4:48
I think that even if it were like, you know a few people with some minority
4:53
stake the amount of pressure that I would feel
4:56
Even though I'm saying I don't care if we make a dollar this year. It's all
5:01
about the exponential growth in the future
5:03
And they're like okay. Uh-huh if that actually happened. I just feel like
5:09
an enormous amount of pressure to stop would be put against me and then if I
5:13
didn't then
5:14
They'd find a way to get me out of there
5:17
you know
5:19
just based on conversations that that I that I had last year um
5:24
there's another very controversial thing and
5:27
You know people farther along me scoff at it and just say I'm I'm inexperienced
5:34
and I haven't gotten there yet
5:35
But I just don't believe
5:37
that measuring things ends up in
5:40
Decision-making that's best for the long-term health of the company
5:45
It screwed us last year. I know a bunch of people that it screwed last year
5:50
like spreadsheets in particular
5:52
You sit there you make a model you like build this growth in then you're like,
5:56
oh, how many sales people do I need to make that happen?
5:58
You go out and hire all these people and it doesn't work
6:02
You know because fundamentally
6:06
the salespeople are not
6:08
sourcing the demand but
6:10
Their output is something that you can measure so you assume that since you can
6:14
measure it you can scale it whereas
6:16
in reality
6:20
Demand is getting created from something like what we're doing right now and
6:23
there's no
6:24
way I could measure
6:26
how one person could hear this that could bump into two other people at live
6:31
events and then
6:32
Listen to me on some other person's podcast and then decide to come in through
6:38
some automated
6:39
You know str thing that we have right like the only thing you can measure is
6:44
like
6:44
the point at which this person actually
6:47
Decided raise their hand in declare that they want demo so
6:52
That is not a
6:56
Comfortable paradigm to operate in if you are partnered with an investor
7:02
People want budgets. They want spreadsheets. They want like
7:05
I've never run an AB test. I think that a
7:08
Lot of the tech that we use isn't even valuable
7:12
But like people are looking at metrics and tech companies are able to
7:15
Exploit the fact that we're looking at these metrics and getting in the way of
7:19
stuff that was gonna happen anyway and get you to use their tech
7:21
But I'm just you know, I don't know if that's old school and no new school
7:26
Some people probably say it's just dumb, but I just think that
7:31
the best businesses are
7:34
The greatest entrepreneurs understand that what makes businesses the best are
7:39
things that you can't measure I
7:41
Cherish so much about what this does for my life like this thing that I'm in
7:46
the middle of and how much energy
7:48
it gives me to pursue other things and
7:50
a lot of those things
7:52
may have been compromised
7:55
Had we done it and I'm just so glad that we didn't